Spoilers abound in this review for Sunday’s episode, now available on Comcast OnDemand.
David Simon’s The Wire has been so great so consistently based a lot on Simon’s worldview: fiercely liberal, anti-corporate, a proponent of America’s lost people, and distrustful of any institution except maybe labor unions. He has told us a story for the last four-plus years that is politically charged, seen from the perspective of a pissed-off Baltimore resident who is disgusted with the turns his city and our country have taken in the Bush years.
In the first four seasons The Wire focused on institutions and circles of people that Simon was removed from by at least one click. He is a former Baltimore Sun reporter, who left the paper when offered a buyout, a budgetary measure in which a company saves money by incenting senior staff (read: more highly compensated than younger staff members) to retire early. In telling us stories of police, dock workers, junkies, drug dealers both at street level and the top rung of the US drug trade, kids, educators and politicians he was narrating the lives of those who he knew and had covered as a reporter. Now, in Season 5, The Baltimore Sun itself becomes a part of the story, as Simon takes on the media in the final 10 episodes of his masterpiece of a drama. And in doing so, he may be headed down a road in which he tarnishes the reputation of that masterpiece.
I think Simon is too close to the newspaper to tell the story objectively, something that a reporter should always do. Roger Twigg, the police reporter in The Wire is a clear alter-ego for Simon: a little stocky, balding, hanging out on the loading dock having a smoke with the other veterans of the staff. In Episode 3, he’s offered a buyout and takes it, saying now is the time to start work on the Great American Novel. Simon has spoken in interviews about his disgust for the brass at The Sun who were managing the paper when he left, and–again to the detriment of The Wire–he has transferred that disgust directly to the characters of Executive Editor James C. Whiting III (third, get it? There have been others just like him) and Managing Editor Thomas Klebanow (awfully close to Marimow, the surname of the Editor at The Sun when Simon took his buyout.)
In The Wire Whiting (White, get it? He’s corporate) is completely aloof. He is out to cut jobs, saving money, and to win Pulitzer Prizes by telling the “Dickensian” story of Baltimore denizens. (The real Sun would go on to win two Pulitzers under Marimow, telling those Dickensian stories.) Whiting favors Scott Templeton, an ambitious young reporter who bemoans the lack of news in Baltimore and who dreams of hitting it big at “The Times or The Post.” Templeton is another target of Simon’s wrath: he’s emblematic of the young reporters who remained at The Sun after buyouts. In Season 5 of The Wire Templeton fabricates everything, from phony quotes attributed to high-ranking city officials to entire stories: a black kid in a wheelchair who skipped school for opening day at Camden Yard. Templeton can offer no photo of the kid, no last name, just a bunk story–which Metro Editor Gus Haynes sees right through. (As a spoiler to future episodes, Templeton will make up a whole lot more.) Simon’s dislike for Templeton is clear.
The problem with the Whiting, Klebanow and Templeton characters is that Simon does not treat them the way he has treated every other character on The Wire: fairly, balanced, and with dignity despite their (sometimes many) flaws. The people at The Wire’s paper are all one-note characters. On the other hand, Gus Haynes and some of the other veteran members of The Wire’s Sun are all seen as pure: they know more than the younger staff and their bosses, they don’t make mistakes, they love newspapers and reporting more than prizes.
Simon can’t see any of the newspaper characters clearly because, probably, of his bitterness with the real Baltimore Sun. When Whiting gives his blessing to Templeton’s entirely made-up story about the wheelchair kid, you wonder how it’s possible that this man ever became the managing editor of a major newspaper. The character in that way is not a genuine, believable person, which runs 180 degrees opposite of The Wire’s tradition of reality.
In Episode 3, after Twigg has taken his buyout, a story is leaked from City Hall: Burrell will be fired by Carcetti, Rawls will be acting police commissioner while Cedric Daniels is groomed to take over the job. Twig is inactive, so Haynes gives the assignment to Templeton. Templeton asks who Daniels is and Twigg, still at his desk, gives us an oral history of Cedric Daniels, not missing a single detail. Simon is telling us what The Sun lost by putting the older staff out to pasture before their time, and it’s a good moment, a moment that’s far better, and far more illuminating that any of the other moments so far this season in the newsroom. Unfortunately, Simon then reverts to having Templeton deliver a phony reaction quote, again hammering home that Templeton is a one-note character.
Away from The Sun, McNulty is falling deeper into alcoholism, causing him to make bad decisions as a detective. He’s adding evidence to old case files and planting an item on his most recent body, furthering his attempt to create a serial killer in hopes that the mayor will put money into the police department that McNulty can use to chase Marlo, who he states is “a real serial killer” with 22 bodies on him. I had a hard time believing in McNulty’s actions in Episode 2, but I can accept that his alcoholism has clouded his judgment. What we’re seeing is the McNulty who existed before the first minute of The Wire: the McNulty who drove his wife away, the McNulty who was out of control. The McNulty of the past 4 seasons has been somewhat of a McNulty in remission, trying to get his life back, but now he has completely lost control due to his drinking problem. Harder to swallow though, is the end of Episode 3, when Lester Freamon agrees to work with McNulty on stringing along his lie. Freamon, like McNulty, has long been dissatisfied with the politics of the police department, and we’ve been told of some bad judgment on his part early in his career. However, we’ve also seen Freamon in the past argue with McNulty over Jimmy’s bull-headed nature, and he’s currently assigned to the Clay Davis case, chasing the money that he desperately wanted to work on in Season 1, working what he and Sydnor have discussed as being a “career case.” I know he wants Marlo, but I also think that his partnering with McNulty on the creation of a serial killer is even more out of character than McNulty strangling already dead bodies.
At the beginning of Episode 1, Bunk says “The bigger the lie, the more they believe.” Obviously this–and “More With Less”, the title of Episode 1 and a quote we’ve heard from City Hall, the police brass, Whiting and Klebanow–is the theme of Season 5. We’re left to wonder how far McNulty can go on his lie, and how far Templeton can continue on with his. Will Simon give any kind of balance to Templeton, to Klebanow, to Whiting? Will the latter two show us that they know enough as the top dogs at The Sun to finally question Templeton’s stories, as Gus and other veterans at the City desk already have? Or will Simon try to live with his lie that everyone is complex except his former bosses and younger co-workers? That would be a shame.
11 responses so far ↓
Failan // January 19, 2008 at 8:48 pm
The Scott Templeton character is based on the Sun reporter, Jim Haner. He was accused of fabricating stories, making up quotations, misquoting and other factual errors. The Sun printed many retractions due to his ethical lapses. But he was the golden boy of the editors and protected by management:
http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=10193
http://www.citypaper.com/bob/story.asp?id=564
urbanfervor // January 19, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Failan–quite true. And who began allegations against Haner? None other than David Simon.
http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=10193
The same David Simon who co-created The Wire and who said he “watched Carroll and Marimow ’single-handedly destroy’ The Sun.” And who “told an audience over 15 entertaining but chillingly self-aware minutes, he has spent more than a decade trying to get back at them.” …and… “anything I’ve ever accomplished as a writer, as somebody doing TV, anything I’ve ever done in life, down to, like, cleaning up my room, has been accomplished because I was going to show people that they were [bleeped] up, wrong, and that I was the [bleeping] center of the universe and the sooner they got hip to that, the happier they would all be.”
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.vozzella06jan06,0,2145567.column
Don’t get me wrong from this, or from my review of Episode 3 above, that I’m a Simon hater. I love The Wire, I think it’s the best thing on TV. But I think his desire to get back at the Sun is hurting the last season of the show.
Jeff Milner dot Com » Blog Archive » The Wire - S05E03 // January 21, 2008 at 12:12 am
[...] to watch tonight’s episode of The Wire (The best TV show ever). As always, urbanfervor has a fantastic review. (Spoiler Warning). Read More Post a [...]
sauerkraut // January 22, 2008 at 2:56 am
I was a Wire watcher until this year. That’s when Comcast put it on the premium tier. I ain’t helping the Roberts family get richer; I just want to watch better tv!!
Jim Haner sure sounds like Mike Barnicle.
urbanfervor // January 22, 2008 at 3:33 am
Sauerkraut:
1. Your loss
2. The Wire has always been on HBO, which has always been a premium channel.
tony1381 // January 22, 2008 at 10:04 am
I just started watching this show, and it is damn good. Not sure how I missed this one the past few yers.
urbanfervor // January 22, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Tony, lucky you the past seasons are all available on DVD, many are streaming or available as torrents online. I highly recommend devoting a weekend to playing catch-up. As much as I’m sure you’re enjoying the new season, The Wire requires knowledge of the past to appreciate what’s going on now. Like Nick Sobotka yelling at Carcetti during his ribbon cutting. Seems like a throwaway, but highly rewarding for those who know who Nicky is. (Though personally, I’m confused. Thought he entered witness protection to avoid his drug charge in S2E13.)
bunkie#1 // January 23, 2008 at 2:15 am
Your first comment is a little sensational. This work is not a fiercely liberal crusade. It is an accurate depiction of corruption and poverty in a community without sufficient resources. It’s not about one writer’s agenda, it’s a tale of the way things are, the situation and environments in which residents of the fair city of baltimore live and work and breathe and survive. Baltimore is a fierce town – the story is more primal than activism. It really is about survival.
Bunk is a term of endearment, not an adjective.
urbanfervor // January 23, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Bunkie:
I didn’t use the word “crusade”, but certainly did say, and do stand behind my assertion that, The Wire is fiercely liberal in its politics, which I don’t mean as a criticism or a compliment. (Based on my own politics, though, if I were to use it as one or the other, “fiercely liberal” would be a compliment.)
On “crusade”: while I didn’t use the word, it’s not a bad one for the newspaper storyline of Season 5: see the links in a comment I made above. Anyone who reads what Simon has said about his motivation in general, and this season in particular, who wouldn’t describe him as on a crusade would be fooling themselves.
On “bunk”: While it may be a term of endearment in certain areas, there are only three real definitions of the word according to most dictionaries: 1. relating to beds or lodging, 2. fleeing a place or situation, and 3. nonsense or unacceptable behavior. It’s defined nowhere as a term of endearment.
bunkie#1 // January 26, 2008 at 6:49 pm
UF,
Thanks for your comments. Detective Bunk is based on an actual detective who went by the nickname ‘bunk.’ You’re not going to find it in any dictionary. It’s a local thing, as in:
“Hey bunk, you want another boh?”
There’s a short clip in the features section where John Waters says, “It (the wire) is not a tragic picture of Baltimore, it is a part of Baltimore that is tragic.” My point is simply, if you focus on the personal investment of Simon, you lose the greater picture of what is happening.
Baltimore natives are idiosyncratically non-crusaders. If anything, a bland malaise permeates the city (not to say that they are not intelligent, ambitious or politically-driven people). David Simon knows this, and wants to tell the story of it, but I don’t believe he is looking to roll heads. It is more important that we sympathize with the citizens of the community, and understand the various circumstances which leave them with no options.
I prefer Season 5 the least, as it comes across a little inbred, and slightly un-Baltimore (thus far). Let’s hope that changes.
-b
urbanfervor // January 26, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Bunkie:
Yeah, seems like everyone on The Wire is based on a real detective, cop, writer, etc. based on Simon’s experiences with The Sun and in researching Homicide.
You summed up my original post: I like Season 5 least for the same reasons.